1996-03-19                     House Journal                      Page 3204
HB 42                                                                        
Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the                
House consider the Senate message (page 3190) on the following at              
this time:                                                                     
                                                                               
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 42 (STA) am                                             
An Act relating to absentee voting, to electronic transmission of             
absentee ballot applications, and to delivery of ballots to absentee           
ballot applicants by electronic transmission, and enacting a                   
definition of the term `state election' for purposes of absentee               
voting.                                                                        
                                                                               
and                                                                            
                                                                               
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 42(FIN)                                   
An Act relating to absentee voting, to electronic transmission of             
absentee ballot applications, and to delivery of ballots to absentee           
ballot applicants by electronic transmission, and enacting a                   
definition of the term `state election' for purposes of absentee               
voting; and providing for an effective date.                                   
                                                                               
(Technical title change.)                                                      
                                                                               
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                   
                                                                               
Representative Vezey moved that the House concur in the Senate                 
amendment to CSHB 42(STA) am, thus adopting SCS CSHB 42(FIN),                  
and recommended that the members vote yes.                                     
                                                                               
The question being:  Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment            
to CSHB 42(STA) am?  The roll was taken with the following result:             
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 42(FIN)                                                               
Concur                                                                         
                                                                               
YEAS:  35   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  5                              

1996-03-19                     House Journal                      Page 3205
HB 42                                                                        
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton,                      
Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly,           
Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Navarre,                   
Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders,        
Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis                                    
                                                                               
Absent:  Brice, Brown, Davies, Kubina, Moses                                   
                                                                               
                                                                               
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting             
SCS CSHB 42(FIN).                                                              
                                                                               
Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the                
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the        
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.           
                                                                               
The Chief Clerk was instructed to so notify the Senate.                        
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 42(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.